Not many films can boast having the Olympics, world warfare, a plane crash, shark attacks, and torturous imprisonment, but this one does…and then some. Throw in a riveting true story and one of Hollywood’s most glamorous women to direct it, and you’ve got the makings of a perfect blockbuster, right? Well, not quite.
The film Unbroken tells the remarkable true story of Louis Zamperini, an Italian-American Olympic athlete and World War II prisoner. It’s based on the acclaimed book Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption by Laura Hillenbrand and directed by Angelina Jolie. Louis grew up in a religious home but showed no interest in church. He was often bullied for being an Italian immigrant and took part in stealing, drinking, smoking, and fighting at an early age. He never thought he’d amount to much in life until his older brother, Pete, helped him turn his life around and began training him for long-distance running in track. Louis then became an outstanding runner and eventually qualified for the 1936 Olympics.
This experience had a huge impact on Louis and prepared him for the Air Force and the suffering he would face during World War II. On May 27, 1943, his B-24 plane crashed into the Pacific Ocean, where he was lost at sea for 47 days. After battling the elements and miraculously surviving the ordeal, Louis is captured by the Japanese and tortured repeatedly for more than two years.
One of the most compelling parts of Louis’ story is the conflict between him and Mutsuhiro Watanabe, an Imperial Japanese Army sergeant, who saw Louis as a threat to his authority and took sick pleasure in tormenting Louis. How much suffering can one person endure? No matter what was thrown at him, Louis’ will remained unbroken. The story falters about halfway through because the focus is on a cycle of suffering and there’s no real character development in Louis. This is problematic because it removes the audience from the story and doesn’t keep them engrossed, even though Louis’ experience is remarkable and inspiring.
Sprinkled throughout the movie are some simple moments of faith, prayer, and the struggle to understand the meaning of suffering. Louis occasionally observes the faith of others around him. Some have criticized the generic form of faith that is presented in the movie, but I think it was used far more effectively than many Christian films that can be preachy and overbearing.
The film is beautifully shot, and I was pleasantly surprised by Angelina Jolie’s directing abilities. I think she has a promising career ahead of her as a director, but the film could have really soared in the hands of a more experienced director, such as Kathryn Bigelow or Steven Spielberg. The relatively unknown cast deserves a shout out for its solid performances, especially from Jack O’Connell (Louis) and Takamasa Ishihara (Mutsuhiro).
Unbroken is one of those epic life stories that a single film cannot really do justice. I think this one bit off a little more than it could chew. By trying to include as many events as possible, the story and character development suffered. Overall, the movie is worth seeing, but it lacks the emotional impact that this story deserves.
Release Date: December 25, 2014
Running Time: 2 hr. 17 min.
MPAA Rating: PG -13 for war violence including intense sequences of brutality, and for brief language
Production Co.: 3 Arts Entertainment, Jolie Pas, Legendary Pictures
NON-TRADITIONAL STUDENT: Hilary Swank as Betty Anne Waters in Conviction.
In Conviction, Hilary Swank portrays Betty Anne Waters, the real-life woman who earned her law degree and fought for 18 years to prove the innocence of her wrongfully convicted brother. We spoke with Betty Anne Waters and lawyer Barry Scheck about the film and Scheck’s Innocence Project, which works on behalf of unjustly imprisoned individuals. (more…)
Inconvenient Truth-Teller: Waiting for ‘Superman’ director/activist Davis Guggenheim
Director Davis Guggenheim’s Waiting for ‘Superman’ has set off fiery debates and earned him the scorn of teacher groups across America. But it’s all right with him, if the film leads to the nation getting more serious about saving its public schools.
Chances are you’ve heard about Davis Guggenheim’s documentary Waiting for ‘Superman,’ which opened nationwide in theaters last weekend and has already grossed $1.6 million at the box office (a significant amount for a documentary). Guggenheim’s film has challenged Americans to stand up for children and fix the country’s broken education system. As with his previous film, the Oscar-winning An Inconvenient Truth, Waiting for ‘Superman’ has been the subject of plenty of controversy and debate, and has faced strong opposition (teacher unions) as well as strong support (Oprah!). Guggenheim recently sat down with UrbanFaith to discuss the film and how the church community can get involved in saving our schools.
URBAN FAITH: Since making this film, have you noticed any faith-based initiatives that are getting involved with this issue?
DAVIS GUGGENHEIM: Yeah, the amazing thing about the movie is it speaks to everyone, no matter what his or her faith or political leanings. And the people who see the movie just fall in love with the kids and are inspired by the parents, because they see that every kid deserves a great education. I think faith-based groups see the moral consequences of our schools and that it’s a moral obligation to give every kid a great education.
How do you think the faith community can get more involved in the public education issue?
A lot of the big decisions happen behind closed doors at a negotiating table — the superintendent, a mayor, school board, union members. The seat that is often not filled is the person who’s fighting for the kids. What Michelle Rhee [chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools system in Washington, D.C., who recently announced her resignation] says in the movie is that the system works for the adults — for harmony amongst adults. The people who get neglected are the kids. I think the power to help the kids can come from faith-based groups — people who can organize and gather and say this is important for our community; the heart of our community is a great school. With that collective power, they can really put a lot of muscle toward making decisions at that table to give every kid a great education.
What are your thoughts on the negative response from certain teacher groups and unions?
I think some of the dialogue has gotten a little heated. A lot of that comes from people who haven’t seen the movie or don’t want you to see the movie. When people see the movie, they see that at its heart are these kids who just want a great school. Even though there’s a lot of politics in the movie, the message is really apolitical. It asks the simple question: Why can’t we give every kid a great education? And the kids in my movie don’t care what the school is called, and they don’t care how it gets fixed or who’s to blame. They just want a great school.
Has the response from teachers who have seen the film been positive?
I think the majority of teachers get it. There are so many great teachers out there who are slugging it out every day, and they are already fighting for kids. A lot of things I bring up in the movie, they deal with every single day — the vast bureaucracies, the very strict rules. The majority of teachers welcome the message of the movie.
What challenges did you face while putting this documentary together?
I think the biggest challenge of making this movie has been to get people to believe again — that it’s possible. That sounds really simple, but in many of these neglected neighborhoods there’s this sense of “this is what you get” and “it’s been this way for a long time,” and that maybe it can’t be done. What I think is so inspiring about the message of the movie is that I’m showing — through the stories of Geoffrey Canada [president and CEO of the Harlem Children’s Zone], the kids’ schools, and these great, inspired reformers — that it actually can be done if we have the political will and the moral will. And the idea of the movie speaking to regular people — mothers and fathers and churches — to say it’s time for us to come together and demand good schools and believe again.
When people walk away from this film, what kind of reaction do you want from them? What kind of actions should they be inspired to take?
Well, the first step is seeing the movie, because it gives you this basic primer on how we’ve gotten to where we’re at. And it really shows you the stakes; you feel what it’s like to want your kid to have a great education or to want to have big dreams. And you feel the consequences when you see Daisy and Anthony [students] in this movie. So that’s the first thing: to really see the movie and feel the stakes. And the next thing you do is act locally. See how you can help your local school. There are a hundred ways to help –simple ways like mentoring and volunteering, and then bigger ways like knowing who your school board member is, and letting your voice be heard, and joining your church or group and saying, let’s use our group power to push leaders to go further and to make decisions that are good for kids.
How has this film changed you?
It’s funny. When you have a little documentary and it starts to do well, you realize that it does well because of these “little angels” all the along the way — members of the press, elected officials, regular people who tell friends to go. The success of a little documentary comes from all these people. I find myself saying at the end of the day to everybody, “God bless you.” I’m not sure what religion I am, but “God bless you” — only because I feel like it really takes a certain kind of shared belief to get this thing done and to really bring people together to do something good. That’s the exciting part about it. That’s how it’s changed me. I’m just one piece of it. I’m a filmmaker, so I’m doing my piece. But everyone along the way is doing his or her piece, from mothers and dads, to teachers, to pastors and politicians.
I’m sure very few people have heard of this film. There seemed to be very little marketing behind it, which is truly a shame. I was pleasantly surprised by this little gem.
Based on the book of the same name by W. William Winokur (who also wrote the script), The Perfect Game recounts the true story of a scrappy group of boys in Monterrey, Mexico, who end up competing in the 1957 Little League World Series in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. Padre Esteban (Cheech Marin), the local Catholic priest, mentors the boys, fuels their baseball dreams, and guides their faith in God. Cesar Faz (Clifton Collins Jr.) coaches the new team, but struggles to overcome his failed attempt as a baseball prospect in America due to racism. Other supporting characters include Maria (Patricia Manterola), the coach’s love interest, and Frankie (Emilie de Ravin from ABC’s Lost), a sassy newspaper reporter who documents the boys’ journey.
A young boy with a tragic diagnosis. A mailman who has lost his way. A powerful message of Christ’s love and forgiveness. Sounds like the perfect Christian movie, right? Sadly, no. As much as I wanted to like this film, I just couldn’t. Now before you call me the Tin Man (no heart) and say that I kick puppies for fun, just hear me out.
Letters to God is about an 8-year-old boy named Tyler (played by Tanner Maguire) who writes letters to God during his battle with cancer. These letters impact the boy’s family, which includes his mother (Robin Lively), grandmother (Maree Cheatham), and older brother (Michael Bolten), and the life of a spiritually broken mailman (played very well by Jeffrey S. Johnson). Other cast members include Ralph Waite, L. Derek Leonidoff, and Bailee Madison.
I have two big problems with the movie. My first problem is that there really is no story. A boy with cancer is not a story. That’s a character. A boy with cancer writing letters to God is not a story. That’s a gimmick. Some will disagree with me because this film is based on a true story, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you have enough elements for an engaging movie.