“When they called my name, I had this feeling I could hear half of America going, ‘Oh no! Oh come on, why her? Again!’ ” Those opening lines of Meryl Streep’s acceptance speech at the Academy Awards this past Sunday verbalized my sentiments exactly, and I’m sure the sentiments of many others. Though Streep is an excellent actor, I was disappointed that Viola Davis, the gifted actor who played Aibileen Clark in The Help, wasn’t chosen as this year’s Best Actress by the committee handing out those coveted Oscars.
While I know I wasn’t alone in my disappointment, I’m sure there were also African Americans who were actually relieved that Davis did not win. That’s just how strong the displeasure among many African Americans was regarding Davis’ role as a ’60s-era Jackson, Mississippi-based maid in The Help. Based on the bestselling novel by Kathryn Stockett, The Help was a source of controversy almost from the beginning, with the African American community up in arms about the movie and Ms. Davis’ decision to play a maid. In an impromptu Facebook survey of my friends, I found mostly mixed emotions about The Help. “African American actors, as well as other actors of color must be selective in the roles they choose to play,” said one friend. “They must really know the purpose behind the film, the targeted audience, and avoid stereotypical roles.” Her view seems to represent the opinion of many.
The general consensus, as seen in the news media, is that African Americans are weary of seeing Black actors in subservient roles, as well as the lack of quality leading roles and films that offer a broader view of the African American experience. It didn’t matter that Ms. Davis did a superb job in her portrayal of Aibileen, personalizing the character through knowledge of her family’s heritage of domestic workers. Many people simply were ambivalent about the notion of another Black actor playing a stereotype. Ms. Davis, however, saw the importance of her role when she told Fresh Air host Terry Gross, “You’re only reduced to a cliché if you don’t humanize a character. A character can’t be a stereotype based on the character’s occupation.”
Ms. Davis makes a good point, but even she has acknowledged the dearth of quality roles for Black actors. This has led to the enduring perception that the Academy Awards voting committee, which a recent Los Angeles Times report observed is 94 percent White and 77 percent male, is naturally disinterested in seeing non-White actors in substantial leading roles that transcend standard stereotypes.
I confess that I had my own reservations about seeing The Help initially, having grown tired of movies with Black domestic servants raising white people’s children while often neglecting the needs of their own families. I had seen enough of it, and even heard many real-life stories about it from my own family. Many, if not most, of our ancestors in the 1960s and prior — from the North to the South and everywhere in between — cooked, cleaned, sewed, chauffeured, handled the interests of, and had a part in raising the children of white families. Most of us don’t want to be reminded, preferring instead to highlight past and current achievements of many highly accomplished African Americans in our community. So was this movie a proverbial push back in line and one of “knowing one’s place,” as the Old South would remind us? Or could it be a realistic portrayal of a not-so-distant time in American history?
Another issue raised by the film is this: Should Black people continue to be angry about Hollywood’s shortsightedness when it comes to making films that authentically reflect African American life? Or, should we simply be grateful and celebrate whenever African American actors do their jobs well, no matter the roles they’re given to play?
In an appearance on ABC’s The View, Ms. Davis talked about her initial reluctance to take on the role. “You knew there was going to be a backlash from the African American community,” she told Barbara Walters and the other ladies. “It is a story set in 1962 about maids who are not educated, and I thought that people would look at that and they wouldn’t see the work.”
Seeing the work for what it was, I appreciated the film’s artistry. After counting the few films of Davis’ I had seen, I read her filmography of 40 films to date, including titles like Law Abiding Citizen and Antwone Fisher, but also Tyler Perry’s Madea Goes to Jail. I wondered about the attention or lack thereof, garnered from Davis’ previous roles, like the characters she played as the BBF (i.e., Black Best Friend) opposite Julia Roberts in Eat, Pray, Love and Diane Lane in Nights in Rodanthe, providing a shoulder to cry on and mother wit, to boot. And let’s not forget Doubt, where Davis earned Oscar and Golden Globe award nominations for Best Supporting Actress. In that film, Davis played opposite Meryl Streep (again!), who was nominated for Best Actress. Surely, we all saw those movies. Didn’t we?
In that Facebook poll I conducted, some of my friends stated that African American directors should correct the problem of limited film choices for Black actors by creating films with great Black characters. While that’s an understandable sentiment, do we need to be reminded that it takes ambitious amounts of funding and the blessing of countless (usually White) Hollywood decision makers to get any type of movie made today? Hollywood finances what the majority of moviegoers will pay for (notwithstanding the bootleg copies of released films that probably sell exponentially above the few actual ticket sales at the box office). If Hollywood won’t fund the films we want to see, we get angry with directors like Spike Lee, John Singleton, and the Hughes Brothers for neglecting to make them (as if these directors owe us.) How many times have you heard people in our community complain about the latest gangsta film featuring do-wrong black characters? Rarely.
When Hattie McDaniel became the first African American actor awarded the coveted Oscar for her 1939 portrayal of Mammy in Gone With the Wind, we applauded even as she poignantly expressed her hope that she would “always be a credit to my race and to the motion picture industry.” Was anyone complaining then? Fast forward some 70 years later and many of us are complaining, as Tavis Smiley did on his PBS show, about Davis’ nomination.
During his interview with Davis and her Help costar Octavia Spencer (who went on to win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress), Smiley remarked: “There’s something that sticks in my craw about celebrating Hattie McDaniel so many years ago for playing a maid … [and] here we are all these years later … and I want you to win … but I’m ambivalent about what you’re winning for.” The actress shot back: “That very mindset … that a lot of African Americans have is absolutely destroying the Black artist.”
As Hollywood continues to finance movies it deems profitable, we may continue to see characters like Aibilene Clark and the young, white, savior-esque character, Skeeter. And know that the majority of the Academy is White and male.
Whether refusing to support Black artists will contribute to their ultimate destruction, as Davis contends, is up for debate. But while you stand your ground waiting for Hollywood to showcase those artists in more desirable roles, think about supporting them in the meantime. Honor their attempts to make strides in a nearly impenetrable industry that still gives crumbs to Black and other minority actors, compared to the whole slices of cake the majority often receives.
This is a great perspective. Thank you.
Janet makes very excellent points here in her perspective. It is very difficult for us as a people to watch these type of time period characters being displayed, however, we have to know that it did happen and it can be sugar coated. We do have films out there, which have also depicted African American in a more favorable role during questionable time periods. Such as, the Great Debaters, Remember the Titans etc. But we have to show the negative and the positive, because it existed. Like with the movie the Pianist, it showed a Jewish a man and people going down to the lowest character forms, however it was what happen. It was also necessary for Jews so they can remember. Sometimes we must see what is horrible so we can remember not to ever go back to that era again.
Great article!
I thought there ought to be a lot more uproar about the women in “Benjamin Button”‘s nomination (she played a maid) as well as the ladies in “The Help” who were nominated. Why aren’t they playing businesswomen, mothers, assassins, ???? Anything. I wouldn’t think they would even want those roles. But, then, I grew up in DC in a different time. Now, I guess it’s OK again?
Not forgotten, but not receiving recognition. Remember Halle Barry won the first Oscar for an African American woman in a leading role for playing a drug addicted, murderous prostitute? Where is their outcry at being considered for these parts, not demanding better? I agree with the comments about the writing. Isn’t it possible for those African American writers to see these women as more? Or is it just that those roles would not receive recognition or box office? Tyler Perry seems to be doing OK and so does Dr. Bill Cosby. Would love to hear his thoughts.
We are destroying our own black art, so Viola Davis states. NO, we are fighting for its survival in “revisionist” times. The truth is that artistry doesnt exist in a vacuum, there’s no art for its own sake as Viola wants to believe. Art is a form of protest when you are oppressed. And art is a form of oppression when you are the oppressor.
We ought not accept crumbs and be happy about it. That has never been our spirit as black people. We’d still be in slavery otherwise. Back in the day, Lena Horne and those great artists understood that accepting crumbs wasnt an option, and they fought against the racism that would edit out a black woman from a film when it showed in the south.
Those are the shoulders that today’s artists stand on. I suppose if they accepted crumbs, there would be no Viola Davis today. They accepted the fight, accepted the repercussions of the fight – blackballing by hollywood – but they fought. They morphed their artistry onto the stage of the civil rights struggle instead. They made do, and we adore them for it.
These are the shoulders that Viola and Octavia stand upon. Yet they want art for its own sake. That would be fine if hollywood racism would allow it. Since it wont, then Viola and Octavia find themselves in this “revisionist” position. But will they stand up to the challenge as their artist forebears did? Will they do like Lena, and Ruby Dee and Eartha Kitt and others? Or will they whine and blame black people for white hollywood racism? We as black people shouldnt have to be subjected to something that we dont want, just to appease Viola and others who feel as she does. I dont need to see another mammy figure, no matter how brilliantly Viola can play her.
Times have changed drastically for black people in every area including the arts. Its close to being what it was 60 years ago. But will Viola and others have the courage to call it out as it stands, the way their forebears did? Will they call a spade a spade?
Who knows, whether Viola was not called to speak out against the Hollywood Kingdom for such a time as this?