Five reasons why the church should support health-care reform. An urban pastor’s view.
I approach the discussion about health-care reform from the perspective of an urban minister. I’ve worked with urban core neighbors, neighborhoods, congregations, and community groups for more than 20 years. I’ve watched people struggle to access basic health services in the shadow of world-class hospitals. I know hardworking people caught in the “catch-22” level of income: They make too much to access Medicaid but too little to afford health insurance premiums. They work for companies that either don’t offer health insurance or offer it partially at a level these employees can’t afford.
Workers are forced to use a patchwork of health fairs, free clinics, and doctors who will see them occasionally without cost (God bless these). They put off illness or pain until it becomes chronic or unbearable and then make a dash to an emergency room. The health costs they incur are a greater portion of their household income than most Americans. The cost to their dignity is inestimable. But the cost to America’s integrity is even higher.
At the same time, I know that health-care costs are spiraling upward for higher-wage neighbors. The monthly cost for my family’s health insurance is higher than our mortgage payment. Our benefits are stripped down and our co-pays and deductibles are higher than ever.
I know people whose prescriptions are no longer covered, whose important procedures are denied, and whose insurance has been dropped. Many people have filed bankruptcy due in large part to unpayable medical bills.
In short, while the health-care system has not been working for the working poor for a long time, it is not working for more and more middle-income neighbors. None of this begins to factor in the significant levels of abuse of the system by those who game it — professional health-care providers, the insurance industry, and consumers of health-care services. The current system is not sustainable, it is not reasonable, it is not just. It does not reflect what we know is best about or for America.
So, I am completely on board with the call for quality, accessible, affordable health care for all citizens. I’m advocating for this from the perspective of an urban Christian minister on the one hand, and as an American citizen on the other.
As a Christian minister, I am convinced that quality, accessible, affordable health care for all is a moral imperative. As an American citizen, I am personally convinced it is a right that’s implied in the very intent of our Constitution and historic social contract. But it is as a Christian minister that I offer the following considerations on health-care reform to the church I love:
1. The Samaritan principle sets the tone for the Christian church regarding care for the poor, uninsured, and desperate in our land. Simply put, in the care a Samaritan extends to a wounded, helpless victim, Jesus declares what it means to be an authentic neighbor. If we have the resources to help and heal, we should. Not because we’ll get reimbursed. Not because there’s profit involved. Not because we’ll get recognized or rewarded. But because it reflects the caring, healing intention of God for God’s people in relationship to one another and in witness to the world.
We cannot pass by because we presume somebody else will take care of uninsured people. We cannot ignore what’s happening because it’s just bigger than us or beyond us. Jesus calls us to see, respond, help, comfort, and restore — as if those left out and wounded were our very own.
2. Jesus’ ministry of healing was conducted in the face of structures and regulations designed to control, limit, and exclude. I’ve been reading the Gospels again during this time of national concern about health care. Health and healing was front and center for Jesus. Undoubtedly, Jesus’ healings were a sign that he was the anticipated Messiah and that a new era was beginning. However, Jesus’ healings also confronted, exposed, and undermined age-old systems that, in the name of health care, prevented healing from occurring.
Jesus cut through the red tape, system-serving regulations, and control-oriented rituals to actually offer what God desired for people — healing, restoration, and a future of dignity and hope. Instead of defending the current status quo practices that place ordinary folks in similar binds, the people who follow and claim to reflect Jesus should consider how he judged and exposed the ineffectiveness and meanness of structures that served themselves at others’ expense.
3. The context of community, inclusion, and sharing resources to assist the neediest — central in the early church witness — is a pattern and principle to renew. Beginning with Acts 2, we see the earliest believers holding things in common, pooling resources, and selling off assets in order to meet the needs of the weakest among them. It was not about me and mine, but we and ours. In the perspective of that early faith community, my personal self-interest includes your well-being. They realized that we are deeply interconnected with one another.
The apostle Paul affirmed this principle with his counsel to the church in Corinth that we are members of one another, that no part can say to another, “I don’t need you.” To what extent are there such awarenesses or practices in the church today? And to what extent is our sense of community — over against asserting individual privilege and private rights — bearing witness to the larger community and nation of what is good, possible, and godly?
4. Christian leaders should be leading the health-care dialogue by seeking the truth and speaking the truth. To this point, it doesn’t seem to me that there has been a debate or dialogue about health-care reform. Much of the so-called debate to this point has focused on myths, distortions, and outright lies about proposed health reform legislation. The news media focus has been on misinformed people shouting down congressional leaders, calling them Nazis, and burning them in effigy.
I’m convinced Christians should not only not be a part of those scenarios, but that we should make a contribution to the dialogue that is fact-based, truth-seeking, civil, and that moves all to find the common ground necessary to ensure that quality, accessible, affordable health care is available to all American citizens.
If the news media or partisan groups play to distortions and extremes, then people of Christian faith have a significant role to get the facts, convey them in understandable ways, and create conversations that deal in what’s real. We are the people whose scriptures declare, “you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free” (John 8:32). We are the people who are reminded that “God has given us, not a spirit of fear, but of power, of love, and of self-discipline” (2 Tim. 1:7).
5. Let us embody and advocate for the principles, practices, and norms of the beloved community toward which Jesus pointed. Christians have no stake in propping up old-order systems, or aligning ourselves with self-serving institutions, or playing to sub-Christian social stratifications. At personal, community, and systemic levels, Christians are challenged to practice now the norms and promises of the future described in the Scriptures.
I love the way Bible scholar Walter Brueggemann puts it: “God’s future is enacted as present neighborliness.”
Is not quality, accessible, affordable health care for all one such act of “present neighborliness” that is a signal of the direction God intends the future to move? I think so. And I invite Christians and people of other faiths to join me and others in this kairos moment — this period of unique opportunity to witness something magnanimous and restorative in our generation.
This article appears courtesy of a partnership with Sojourners.
I agree that health care reform is needed because it is a flawed system with outrageous costs, but I do not believe a government-controlled health care system is the answer. I feel this article ingnores this aspect of the debate.
Since when did health care become a right? To say that everyone is entitled to health care simply because Jesus healed people is a false assumption. Jesus did not heal people because they had a right to it (He did not heal all people); He did it as a witness to show God’s awesome power.
I do have a right to decide who I get my treatment from when and where I need it. By having the government dictate these things, it infringes on my true individual rights. I work hard to earn the insurance that I have to pay for my health care. I do not work hard so I can pay for other people’s health care. Government-controlled health care does not offer quality, accessible, affordable health care.
Here are three articles of interest: http://www.reason.com/news/show/135580.html
http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/wm2448.cfm
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/03/what_right_to_health_care_97742.html
“MY true individual rights.”
“I work hard…for MY health care.”
“I do not work so I can pay for OTHER PEOPLES’s health care.”
Stretch, could you imagine Jesus saying these words you’ve written? You say that Jesus didn’t heal people because they had a RIGHT to it, but you sure seem to value your own rights.
Of course I value my rights, as any person should. That is why I do not want the government to take them away from me or from anyone else. Where I mentioned my rights in the previous post, it is referring to everyone’s rights, not just my own.
We should value the right to pursue and obtain, if we so choose, the health care of our choice. We do not have a right to automatically have health care, but if we want health care, there are things we can and must do in order to achieve this desire. Sometimes this desire is difficult to achieve or even unobtainable due to costs and so forth. This is where reform comes in.
I am in favor of health care reform so that more people will be able to obtain and afford health care if they choose to have/use it, but I do not like the idea of the government placing everyone in a “one size fits all” plan. It is important to remember that just because a benefit exists does not mean people are entitled to it, but we all do have a right to pursue these benefits if we want to (although this does not necessarily mean we will get them).
President Obama stated- “I know people are cynical we can do this (Healthcare reform).I know there will be disagreements about how to proceed in the days ahead. But I also know that we cannot let this moment pass us by.” “Congress must pass the bill now, we can’t wait?” The proposed bill(s)- there are (4) out there; so Congress should just sign an unfinished 1000+ page bill without reading it and figure the rest out later? Sign on the dotted line and we will figure out the details of the healthcare and end of life options for the American citizens. What is the rush? It took over 7 years to make the Medicaid/Medicare system. Healthcare makes up 1/5 of the U.S. economy and we can decide on Healthcare reform in a couple of weeks? Note: Obama tried to attach healthcare reform to the Economic Stimulus Bill (also a 1000+ pg document given to Congress to approve 1 hour before the vote took place). Obama’s former appointee to head the Department of Health and Human Services, and now exposed tax cheat, Senator Tom Daschle. Daschle spells out the plan on pages 196-197 of his book, Critical – What We Can Do About the Health Care Crisis, “The next president should act immediately to capitalize on the goodwill that greets any incoming administration. If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it. This issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.” In other words, public debate should be avoided, forget about democracy – so that Obama-care does not meet the same fate as Hillary-care. Cost is the biggest issue of healthcare reform. Before we pass a bill we have to know the bottom line. We have to know how we will pay for it. We also need to know the affects a proposed bill will have on the individual citizen, small business owners, doctors and hospitals. In order to make a decision on the best path to healthcare reform we must be able to read, debate and examine a detailed, tangible bill. For all that to be accomplished in two weeks is, in a word, impossible. (Mesa Independent Examiner Christina Wijfjes-Smit)
Saints of God- don’t be fooled by a “Christian” who is no longer a member of any church, doesn’t attend church, believes “Jesus is a historical figure,” ““I believe there are many paths to the same place (Heaven), and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.” Google the Cathleen Falsani (Sun-Times) interview with Obama.
Is Healthcare is a moral issue? Rev. Jim Wallis (this author does not support), who serves on Obama’s faith council, said his group’s mission is to keep universal health-care coverage alive as a “moral issue.” If we agree or believe that health care is a moral issue, why would we put the people who in a lot cases, lack morals in charge of this issue? With the likes of John Edwards (Sex Scandal), David Vitter (Sex Scandal), Larry Craig (Sex Scandal), Gary Condit (Homosexual Sex Scandal), Tim Geithner (Tax Cheat), Tom Dashle (Tax Cheat), Barney Frank (Homosexual), Ted Stevens (Corruption) and countless others…Ask yourself- Are politicians the right people to look to regarding moral decisions? Your Health?
Recommend Videos/Articles:
ObamaCare Hidden Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9GeBjAb_8M&feature=related
Liberty Counsel- What Americans Need to Know About The Healthcare Takeover
http://www.lc.org/media/9980/attachments/healthcare_overview_obama_072909.pdf
Dr Palmisano at CPPR Press Conference 07.22.2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zILya6ZheE&feature=pyv&ad=2970904436&kw=obama%20health%20care%20plan
College Student Challenges Obama to Oxford-Style Debate (Healthcare) August 15, 2009 9:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lyBbhLxx_Y
The Public Plan Deception – It’s Not About Choice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ-6ebku3_E&NR=1