Debates on our national system of providing health care are raging in political and corporate offices around the country. Traditionally, however, churches and faith centers have been the sites of healing, health, and wholeness for a community.
In the 1970s, many churches in the U.S. experienced a resurgence of “healing ministries” that accompanied a renewed charismatic movement. Though it may not always be God’s purpose and will to perform spectacular demonstrations of his healing power, it is clear that he equips his people with the gift of healing. Healing services, laying on of hands, anointing with oil, healing prayer, and many other manifestations all spring from the healing ministry of Jesus. It’s what he did: He healed. He taught. He saved.
This “making people whole again” was a way Jesus prepared those he met for receiving the Good News into their lives. Karin Granberg-Michaelson wrote in her 1984 Sojourners article, “The Healing Church”:
In considering the healing miracles of Jesus and the profound emphasis he placed on wholeness, we must ask what Jesus wished to communicate through his healing works in people’s lives. That is best answered in the context of more basic assumptions about the meaning of Jesus’ overall ministry in and to the world.
While many churches are deeply faithful to their healing ministry, it sometimes doesn’t make it past the church doors. It doesn’t flow into a social concern for how we as Christians can serve the common good. “If the church is to reclaim its healing ministry, it must ask the question ‘what constitutes wholeness?'” writes Granberg-Michaelson.
Wholeness is not just for the individual or the community of Christians; it is a gift God gives to us and through us for the larger society. It is part and parcel of how we move as a society “toward healing and reconciliation,” as Granberg-Michaelson puts it.
If healing and wholeness (spiritual, physical, and emotional) is a gift that God gives to the church, then it is our responsibility to find ways to share the workings of that gift in service of the common good. Granberg-Michaelson says:
Whole person health care [the treatment of a person as a unity of body, mind, and spirit] is, therefore, the heritage of the church. We must reclaim our function as the primary mediator of healing in society.
One important way that we as Christians can “reclaim our function as the primary mediator of healing in society” is by educating ourselves on the nitty-gritty of the health-care debate and working to craft a system that allows healing to flow throughout our land.
We want to craft a health-care system that honors a fair exchange of money for services, that redistributes our social capital toward the health and healing of all over the long-term, and that allows for philanthropy and generosity of heart by those who can give freely for the betterment of all.
A generous health-care system that reflects a commitment to healing and wholeness for the sake of securing human dignity is a priority. It’s one way Christians can extend our healing ministry toward our national body.
This article appears courtesy of a partnership with Sojourners.
So is this about the church getting behind Obama’s healthcare plan? If that’s the case, I’m not so sure that’s a good idea.
The church or Christians do play a role in this debate. We, Christians, already have abdicated some of our responsibility to the past welfare system. The type of generosity found in the Book of Acts and also found during the Montgomery Bus Boycott is not found today among us. Consumerism has overwhelmed our psyche, and we have no concept that the well being of someone else is caught up in my own well being. The current system is broken. The thought of maintaining this system will hurt our country holistically. why are we the last developed nation to do this?
I agree with Raymond. It’s one thing for the church or Christians to realize that we need to embrace and find ways to take care of our neighbors and each other. It’s quite another for us to support a government plan that will put this country a trillion+ dollars more in debt, not to mention all the special-interest measures that the President and his allies have woven into the plan that have nothing to do with healthcare under any rational definition of the same. Further, I’m not sure the statement about us being the last developed country to institute universal healthcare is quite accurate, but I could be wrong about that. Either way, those countries that have gone this route have national scars and debt to show for it. Something does need to be done about the system, but the plan on the table now is not the answer-by a long shot.